<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Jackson’s Estate: Nightmare for the Family and Long-Term Income for Attorneys, Accountants and Appraisers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.walterbristow.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson%e2%80%99s-estate-nightmare-for-the-family-and-long-term-income-for-attorneys-accountants-and-appraisers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.walterbristow.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson%e2%80%99s-estate-nightmare-for-the-family-and-long-term-income-for-attorneys-accountants-and-appraisers/</link>
	<description>... and musings on the law, taxes, insurance, and a variety of other topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:28:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MJJ-777 &#187; Why Invincible Became Invisible &#38; Other Musings About the Flock of Vultures Surrounding Michael Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.walterbristow.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson%e2%80%99s-estate-nightmare-for-the-family-and-long-term-income-for-attorneys-accountants-and-appraisers/comment-page-1/#comment-6796</link>
		<dc:creator>MJJ-777 &#187; Why Invincible Became Invisible &#38; Other Musings About the Flock of Vultures Surrounding Michael Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walterbristow.com/?p=1218#comment-6796</guid>
		<description>[...] above) still gets 50% of the royalties from MJ&#8217;s songs (MiJac). According to one financial pundit/guru: Sony currently controls the master recordings of Jackson’s music. They are to revert to Jackson [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] above) still gets 50% of the royalties from MJ&#8217;s songs (MiJac). According to one financial pundit/guru: Sony currently controls the master recordings of Jackson’s music. They are to revert to Jackson [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Vineyard</title>
		<link>http://www.walterbristow.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson%e2%80%99s-estate-nightmare-for-the-family-and-long-term-income-for-attorneys-accountants-and-appraisers/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Vineyard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walterbristow.com/?p=1218#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Seems like Elvis was having issues as well when he died. He earns more now than he did while alive.

You can bet MJ will do likewise.

The bigger issue will be custody of the kids who stand to inherit the keys to his income stream. I know you will find this hard to believe, but some reports circulating indicate the kids do not have any of his DNA. 

And there are no records of him adopting them.

If this is true, there is no biological connection so basically these are 3 kids who just happen to live with him.

None the less, the will was filed earlier today. Supposedly the bulk of his estate went to the kids (which he can do even if they are not related), to his mom, some charities. Seems he also wanted his mom to be the guardian of the children and absent that, Diana Ross.

Of course the kids are not property that can be &quot;willed&quot; to someone.

This is going to be tied up in courts for some time. 

[Posted on the Insurance Professionals group on LinkedIn.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like Elvis was having issues as well when he died. He earns more now than he did while alive.</p>
<p>You can bet MJ will do likewise.</p>
<p>The bigger issue will be custody of the kids who stand to inherit the keys to his income stream. I know you will find this hard to believe, but some reports circulating indicate the kids do not have any of his DNA. </p>
<p>And there are no records of him adopting them.</p>
<p>If this is true, there is no biological connection so basically these are 3 kids who just happen to live with him.</p>
<p>None the less, the will was filed earlier today. Supposedly the bulk of his estate went to the kids (which he can do even if they are not related), to his mom, some charities. Seems he also wanted his mom to be the guardian of the children and absent that, Diana Ross.</p>
<p>Of course the kids are not property that can be &#8220;willed&#8221; to someone.</p>
<p>This is going to be tied up in courts for some time. </p>
<p>[Posted on the Insurance Professionals group on LinkedIn.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Ford</title>
		<link>http://www.walterbristow.com/2009/06/30/michael-jackson%e2%80%99s-estate-nightmare-for-the-family-and-long-term-income-for-attorneys-accountants-and-appraisers/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walterbristow.com/?p=1218#comment-216</guid>
		<description>What estate? He was upside down to the tune of either 40 million or 400 million. Either is a big number 

Posted on the Insurance Professionals group on LinkedIn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What estate? He was upside down to the tune of either 40 million or 400 million. Either is a big number </p>
<p>Posted on the Insurance Professionals group on LinkedIn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

